Mobile Website | Login | Register
Staff Directory | Advertise | Subscribe | About Us
Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Business Government Politics Crime/Public Safety Education People Obituaries E-edition
Basketball Football Youth Wrestling Gymnastics Swimming Volleyball Baseball Track Golf Cheer Cross Country Schedule Scores
Backstory Brambleton Community of Faith Hangin in the Nosebleeds Journal Entry Loudoun Essence Made in Loudoun Odd Angles River Creek & Lansdowne South Riding Sterling, Cascades & CountrySide
News Video Your Best Dish Featured Video The Virginians Video Production
Jobs Autos Legals Public Notices Real Estate Place an Ad
Video Production Website Development SEO and SEM Newspaper Advertising Online Advertising
Billions wasted in earmarks as debt grows

Another reason why incumbents are in trouble:

Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) has sponsored earmarks totaling $497,591,000 this year, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense. Earmarks are a senator’s “gifts” to key constituencies in his or her home state. Earmarks buy votes, which help get incumbents re-elected, which leads to more earmarks.


Earmarks are an abuse of power and a waste of taxpayer money. While some are cheap and harmless (expanding a library), many are costly and wrong (a bridge to no where). Cochran leads all senators in earmarks this year, followed by:

Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI): $392,432,850.
Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS): $368,039,000.
Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV): $292,014,000.
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA): $267,589,200.

All figures come from Taxpayers for Common Sense.

“Everybody does it,” is the excuse to justify earmarks. And in the Senate, that’s pretty much true: 84 senators have each spent more than $50,000,000 in earmarks this year and among those, 49 have each exceeded $100,000,000, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense.

But not every senator does it – eight senators have zero earmarks in 2010: Bayh (D-IN), Coburn (R-OK), DeMint (R-SC), Feingold (D-WI), Johanns (R-NE), LeMieux (R-FL), McCain (R-AZ) and McCaskill (D-MO), according to Taxpayers for Common Sense. In the House, only 43 representatives (too many to list here) out of 435 have zero earmarks so far in 2010.

Only these 51 incumbents (less than 10 percent of Congress) are not hypocrites – at least this year – since both Democrats and Republicans en masse decry earmarks while they perpetuate the practice. Both parties are guilty. Both parties shamelessly abuse their power.

Worse, the billions wasted is mostly borrowed money. Our national debt skyrockets as these reckless incumbents – seeking re-election above all else – add to the debt with earmarks. Our children are stuck with the bill – “generational theft” as Sen. McCain calls it.

Many Congressional incumbents deservedly will fall on election day. Let’s hope others are defeated next November. We can’t fire 500 members of Congress quickly, but they can all be fired in time. Their replacements had better heed the message: Show fiscal responsibility, or you too are out the door.

Comments

OK Loudoun Times Mirror.
Now tell us how the LOCAL Congressmen and Senators did.
Then go even deeper and find out exactly how much each of them earmarked and exactly what the earmarks were spent on.
Do some actual investigation and reporting that means something to the average person.


One Congressperson’s earmarks is another’s “constituent service.”

Frank Wolf is appreciated by many because of his efforts in getting federal funds for Northern Virginia. Were they earmarks?

In any event, while fraud and waste should be eliminated, the problem with the federal debt is not solvable with savings on discretionary spending.  About 19 percent of federal spending goes to support a wide variety of other public services. These include providing health care and other benefits to veterans and retirement benefits to retired federal employees, assuring safe food and drugs, protecting the environment, and investing in education, scientific and medical research, and basic infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and airports.  The total proposed FY 2011 budget is $3,690 Billion. 

The federal debt is about three times that, or 300%. While saving a billion here and there is admirable, what we really need are unpopular major cuts in the major spending items such as defense and entitlement programs, and more federal tax and fees income.

Neither political party, including the Tea Party’s self-contradictory proposals to keep the Bush tax cuts for the rich while increasing military spending, has proposals to do what is needed to make more than a dent in the debt. Argumts that lower tax rates will lead to greater federal income because of economic growth was proved in the Reagan-Bush administrations to not only fail to work, but increased the national debt by trillions.

Most Popular in News
Wednesday, May. 16 | 7708 views
Stone Bridge named Top 10 school by U.S. News
Monday, May. 21 | 5838 views
Leesburg high schools switch things around
Tuesday, May. 15 | 4682 views
A taste of Carolina in Loudoun
Stay
Connected

Follow Us
on Twitter

News | Sports

Like Us
on Facebook

News | Sports

Subscribe
via RSS

News | Sports

Join Our
Email List

Sign up for
weekly updates
The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Open the e-edition now.
View our other print publications available online.

Weekly
Homes Guide

2011 Guide
to Loudoun

Holiday
Gift Guide

Health and
Wellness

Bridal
Guide

Historic Frederick
Maryland

Taste
of Loudoun

Senior
Lifestyles

Historic Downtown Leesburg

Future
Leaders

Coming
Soon

Coming
Soon

Northern VA Job Openings

More Northern VA Jobs