Mobile Website | Login | Register
Staff Directory | Advertise | Subscribe | About Us
Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Business Government Politics Crime/Public Safety Education People Obituaries E-edition
Basketball Football Youth Wrestling Gymnastics Swimming Volleyball Baseball Track Golf Cheer Cross Country Schedule Scores
Backstory Brambleton Community of Faith Hangin in the Nosebleeds Journal Entry Loudoun Essence Made in Loudoun Odd Angles River Creek & Lansdowne South Riding Sterling, Cascades & CountrySide
News Video Your Best Dish Featured Video The Virginians Video Production
Full-time Jobs Announcements Autos Legals Public Notices Real Estate Place an Ad
Video Production Website Development SEO and SEM Newspaper Advertising Online Advertising
Observations of a census enumerator in Sterling

I had the privilege of serving as a census enumerator for about six weeks this spring and summer. My assignment was to follow up on residences for which the Census Bureau had not received a valid, completed census form. It was an educational experience.

Many of the homes I visited were in the Sterling area. The residents I talked with were from diverse backgrounds, many of them Hispanic. Although I didn’t speak Spanish, many of the Spanish-speaking residents I talked to were cooperative and we were able to communicate sufficiently to fill out the census form.
I was encouraged and impressed with the number of second-generation teenage children or young adults in immigrant households who understood the purpose and importance of the census. In many cases, they were able to answers questions for their parents.

When asked about the origin or race of their children, a number of immigrant parents proudly told me their children were “American.” One young Hispanic woman told me she had discussed the question of origin with her classmates in school and concluded her origin was American Indian, albeit South American Indian.

Most uncooperative were those who felt the census questions were a government intrusion into their privacy or that they were only required by the Constitution to reveal how many people lived in their household. Much more personal information is revealed to the “government” when people apply for a driver’s license or to insurance companies when they apply for health or life insurance or to banks when they apply for a loan. One person told me he was refusing to answer because he didn’t want to support the “Obama census,” as if this were something the Obama administration was imposing.

Those who refused to answer census questions on constitutional grounds did not understand that the constitution is not a legal document but rather it gives Congress the right to impose laws regarding what information can be collected during a census. The census questions have nothing directly to do with the Constitution. The government has the authority to ask the questions in line with its duty to conduct the census. Permanent U.S. residents are required, by law, to submit to the census, according to U.S. Code Title 13, Section 221. Those who refused to answer were in violation of U.S. law and can be prosecuted and fined. Also, these folks generally were rude and hostile. Fortunately there were few, but more than I had anticipated.

I found most folks to be hospitable and cooperative. Several invited me in and offered me ice tea or cold water during the hot July days. People of Asian background were particularly hospitable.

Finally, as a country, we should be thankful and proud of those dedicated census enumerators that worked all days and hours of the week in rain or 100 degree temperatures, going from door-to-door not knowing what to expect. Most of my co-workers were hard-working, patient, competent and “thick skinned” when verbally assaulted. For many, it was not only a privilege but a job of necessity to make ends meet in this economic climate.

John Wilson

Sterling

Comments

I mailed my form in and then had two additional visits by the Census workers.  I politely answered the questions and he looked on as he checked off my race without asking.  I told he could not do that as I am the one who makes that determination.  I’m wondering how often data is changed???


First. Thanks Mr.Wilson for the article and the work performed.

True North and Mr.Seeman

While I will admit that our founding fathers were quite liberal. The rest of the objections are seriously flawed. The four step program mentioned is used by politicos on both sides of the isle.

Gerrymandering is done at the state level and they don’t need U.S.Census information, they use state and county voter registration infomation to alter voting districts.

Don’t fool yourself, your fears are misplaced, the census make this country a better place for all.

Cheers!


Mr. Seeman,
My sentiments exactly. Our household was picked for an extenstive census out of a “lottery system.”  I agree that this can be used for redistribution of wealth and gerrymandering voting districts.  It happened to us in Maryland, and we’ll never forget how it took away the balance of power from our district.

We were very nice to our census enumerator, and politely told him that we sent in the census that was sent in the mail with the information requested, but we would not submit to more than that.  He was the one that became angry and impolite.


Thanks for this story. It was very nice.  I just do not get how anyone could get that the census is some sort of liberal conspiracy.  I have loved getting the census numbers since I was a kid.  It is amazing to see how our country is growing and changing!


The reason some people such as myself do not want to give information on their race is that the federal government will use it for what adds up to a racial spoils system.  Racial and gender quotas are the norm (even when they go by a different term such as “diversity” or “affirmative action” or “minority set-asides”) and getting worse.

Can Mr Wilson not know this?  Really and truly not understand these things?

Equating questions on race in the federal census with getting your drivers license is therefore absurd. 

But it’s all part of the liberal 4 step:

1) Sneak something in like race based programs
2) Pretend to be surprised when people object
3) Treat people who object with contempt
4) Refuse to tell the truth about the programs in question

Most Popular in News
Wednesday, Feb. 8 | 8441 views
School board adopts fiscal 2013 operating budget
Stay
Connected

Follow Us
on Twitter

News | Sports

Like Us
on Facebook

News & Sports

Subscribe
via RSS

News | Sports

Join Our
Email List

Sign up for
weekly updates
The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Open the e-edition now.
View our other print publications available online.

Weekly
Homes Guide

2011 Guide
to Loudoun

Holiday
Gift Guide

Health and
Wellness

Bridal
Guide

Historic Frederick
Maryland

Taste
of Loudoun

Senior
Lifestyles

Historic Downtown Leesburg

Health
Resolutions

Future
Leaders

Coming
Soon