Mobile Website | Login | Register
Staff Directory | Advertise | Subscribe | About Us
Business Government Politics Region Crime/Public Safety Education People E-edition Ashburn Hamilton Hillsboro Lansdowne Leesburg Lovettsville Middleburg Purcellville River Creek Round Hill Sterling
Basketball Football Youth Wrestling Gymnastics Swimming Volleyball Baseball Track Golf Cheer Cross Country Schedule Scores
Brambleton Community of Faith Hangin in the Nosebleeds Journal Entry Loudoun Essence Made in Loudoun Odd Angles River Creek & Lansdowne South Riding Sterling, Cascades & CountrySide
This Week's Slideshow Browse All Galleries Your Best Dish Featured Video The Virginians
  • Announcements
  • Autos
  • Jobs
  • Legals
  • Homes
  • YardSales
  • Submit an Ad
  • Website Development SEO and SEM Newspaper Advertising Online Advertising
    Classified listings Homes section

    School Board sequestration vote shows members’ political philosophies

    The School Board voted 4-4 with one abstaining, failing to a pass a resolution that opposed sequestration of the federal budget.

    Jennifer Bergel (Catoctin), Thomas Reed (at large), Jeff Morse (Dulles) and Brenda Sheridan (Sterling) voted for the resolution.

    Kevin Kuesters (Broad Run), Debbie Rose (Algonkian), Jill Turgeon (Blue Ridge) and Bill Fox (Leesburg) voted against.

    Chairman Eric Hornberger (Ashburn) abstained from voting. His vote would made a difference between passage and failure. 

    “I don’t think it’s fair to force board members to sign legislation they don’t agree with,” Hornberger said after the meeting as his reason for abstention.

    He said the School Board was going over its purview in trying to influence the federal government.

    Sequestration is a package of $1.2 trillion cuts to the federal budget from 2013 to 2021, evenly split between defense spending and discretionary domestic spending. It was enacted as part of the Budget Control Act, which was the end result of the debt ceiling debate in summer 2011.

    The sequestration process would take effect Jan. 1, 2013, according to The Washington Post.

    The process is a “last resort” measure that would be enacted if Congress can’t come to a deal that cuts the same amount from selected parts of the budget.

    The motion opposed sequestration on the grounds that it would cut $2.7 billion in educational programs nationwide, including an estimated $1.5 million from the school system’s budget, according to staff.

    Members who spoke against the resolution said Loudoun shouldn’t be dependent on the federal government for funding.

    “I think that localities need to get used to having less reliance on the federal government and more reliance on local resources,” Fox said. “It might be an uncomfortable step but I think it’s a step in the right direction.”

    Turgeon said the federal government had too much of a role in the running of schools, including unfunded mandates, or regulations without funding.

    Kuesters said it was hypocritical to believe that the federal government should have to cut back with the exception of Loudoun County’s schools.

    “The direct impact is not that large compared to our total funding,” Kuesters said. “Everybody’s going to learn to have to get along with less.”

    Board members who voted for the resolution disagreed. Morse said it was “about time” the School Board “meddled in federal affairs.”

    “I don’t see it as a face off with the federal government,” Morse said. “I see it as board members taking an active role to protect funding, whether it comes with strings or not.”

    Reed pointed out that about 57 percent of the sequestration cuts would effect the Department of Defense, which would harm the contracting industry that Loudoun is largely dependent on.

    “If that goes we will be in a recession that will make the last one will look like a [economic] boom,” Reed said.

    Bergel urged residents and board members to take the effects of sequestration seriously, calling to mind the layoffs and cuts in last year’s budget.

    “Think about what it would mean if we can’t build more schools, if we can’t hire the people to operate our schools,” Bergel said. “It’s not hyperbole. It’s real. We’ve heard this discussion happening at many levels.”

    Comments

    Talk about over reaching.  The School Board is in the middle of School Boundaries for 14 Elementary Schools, which has the potential of moving thousands of young students.  The current School Board has their priorities & scope of authority completely out of whack. And this proves Chairman Hornberger is incompetent and has let the “power” go to his head.


    Ha ha ha…Skidrow….I agree.  How about the school board get back to it’s own business?  They have plenty of things to screw up other than voting on something that means nothing.


    These board members must be bored. The School Board must be smoking weed if it thinks the Federal Government gives a rat’s butt about what it does.


    I tend to vote left of center on things, but in this case, we’ve got to stop spending money we don’t have, from the top, down.  This should be a wake up call to the BOS - to take a look at future school growth projections and mandate, that the developers will pay much more into new school construction and other infrastructures, than they have been.  For 20 years now, school bond referendums have been on the ballot.  It’s never going to end with the current mindset that this county seems to have.


    Jesus, Kevin Kuesters; we can make cuts without the stupidity of sequestration, Reed is dead on about the disaster sequestration will be for this area. We need new taxes and cuts made but sequestration is a massive recession waiting to happen.


    Sounds like a real waste of time for a local school board to debate the federal budget.  What are they going to do?  Make a call to Frank Wolf?  Frank isn’t even at the table for these talks.  He is off checking out the signage on the Dulles Greenway and eradicating ticks.


    Dear School Board,

    You do your job, and let the federal legislatures do theirs.  You’ve got enough problems to deal with.

    “He said the School Board was going over its purview in trying to influence the federal government.”

    Bravo, Mr. Hornberger.


    Reed is only thinking about his own job since he works for defense contractor…please keep focused on your work at hand…the LCPS!

    StayConnected

    Follow Us
    on Twitter

    News | Sports

    Like Us
    on Facebook

    News & Sports

    Join Our
    Email List

    Sign up for
    weekly updates
    The Loudoun Times-Mirror

    is an interactive, digital replica
    of the printed newspaper.
    Open the e-edition now.
    Get Our Headlines Via Email
    Tuesdays:  
    Thursdays: