Mobile Website | Login | Register
Staff Directory | Advertise | Subscribe | About Us
Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Business Government Politics Crime/Public Safety Education People Obituaries E-edition
Basketball Football Youth Wrestling Gymnastics Swimming Volleyball Baseball Track Golf Cheer Cross Country Schedule Scores
Backstory Brambleton Community of Faith Hangin in the Nosebleeds Journal Entry Loudoun Essence Made in Loudoun Odd Angles River Creek & Lansdowne South Riding Sterling, Cascades & CountrySide
News Video Your Best Dish Featured Video The Virginians Video Production
Jobs Autos Legals Public Notices Real Estate Place an Ad
Video Production Website Development SEO and SEM Newspaper Advertising Online Advertising
Wheatlands property up for auction, but is the School Board interested?

One of the biggest issues that faced Loudoun County last year was the proposed acquisition of 170 acres of land near Waterford.

The land, which became known as The Wheatlands Project, was to be the setting of three new public schools.

The deal immediately saw controversy after a majority of the Board of Supervisors and the School Board voted to purchase the land for more than $11 million.

Alliances were formed, the community voiced its opposition, and months later, the Supervisors reversed their vote, and the deal went away.

Now, more than a year later, 27.6 acres of that property is to be auctioned off on Oct. 14.

But according to Tranzon Fox, the real estate firm in charge of the auction, the 27 acres isn’t exactly the same land the School Board was once interested in.
“It is and it isn’t the same property,” said Jeff Stein the Tranzon contact for the auction.

“The piece of land that the School Board was looking at was indeed part of this farm, but we are currently auctioning a different patch of the land, which includes the Wheatland Manor historic home.”

According to Stein, the person who owns the land, Salvatore Cangiano, has subdivided his property and is planning on selling it to make way for numerous residential lots.

But for now, Stein said,  Cangiano is only selling the historical section of the land.

Officials at LCPS have said that they are not currently looking into purchasing the 27.6 acres of land on Wheatland Manor.

Here is a brief timeline on the rise and fall of The Wheatlands Project:

WHAT IT WAS
Loudoun County Public Schools sought to build three schools in western Loudoun:
ES-25, an 875-student elementary school;
MS-10, a 1,350-student middle school;
and HS-10, a 1,800-student high school. 

The Wheatlands Project would co-locate the three schools on two different properties near Route 287, north of Route 9. 

Salvatore J. Cangiano asked for a $9.925 million contract for his 160-acre property and Alvin and Deborah Burgress asked for a $1.47 million contract for their 10-acre property, for a combined total of more than $11.3 million, or $67,508 per acre.

Feb. 24, 2009
A majority of the Board of Supervisors signaled support for the Wheatlands Project.
The Loudoun County School Board votes 8-1 to approve the purchase of the 170 acres.

Early opposition to building schools at the Wheatland Farm location comes from affected citizens, some of whom are represented by an attorney.

April 29, 2009
Several of those opposed to the site form the Wheatland Alliance, largely composed of residents and farmers along Route 287, the connecting road between Purcellville and Lovettsville.

Supervisor Jim Burton (I-Blue Ridge) is quoted as saying that the $11.3 million price “cannot be justified in the current market.”

May 26, 2009
The School Board votes 6-3 to keep the Wheatlands contract alive.  Opposition comes from Joseph Guzman (Sugarland Run), John Stevens (Potomac) and Bob Ohneiser (Broad Run).

The original asking price for the $11.3 million project is reduced. Cangiano lowers his price for 160 acres from $9.9 million to $7.6 million, reducing the per acre cost to $47,500; a reduction in the contract price of $2.3 million.

The School Board hears from nearly 30 speakers at a public meeting; the majority speaks in opposition to the Wheatlands school site urging the school board to “kill the Cangiano contract.”

May 27, 2009
Supervisors vote 8-1 to eliminate the Wheatlands Project, Supervisor Eugene Delgaudio (R-Sterling) casts the lone vote in support of the School Board contract for Wheatlands.

June 1, 2009
The sole agenda item on a special meeting of the School Board passed 9-0 to terminate the contracts with Cangiano and Burgess

June 19, 2009
A report from the Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit investigative journalism organization, states that the FBI and the U.S. Department of Education are investigating possible misconduct in the site acquisition process for sites for LCPS, a likely repercussion of the controversy surrounding the failed purchase of property at Wheatlands.

The article makes no mention of any interviews, or states any comments, from any LCPS official or school board member regarding the Wheatlands proposals.

Superintendent Ed Hatrick comments by saying that. “No one in an official capacity is accusing the schools or the school board of corruption in land purchases.”

Sept. 13, 2010
Tranzon Fox announces that 27.6 acres of the old property is to be auctioned off.

Sept. 15, 2010
LCPS tells the Loudoun Times-Mirror that they have no plans on purchasing the land

Oct. 14, 2010
More than 27 acres of Wheatland Manor are scheduled to be sold.

Comments

LL, on all the lots that have already been subdivided.  While it may not be for a few years,  with Valley and Woodgrove already near capacity, it won’t be “never”.


With western Loudoun now zoned 1 house per 20 acres, where are all these new kids going to come from?


Woodgrove principal last night stated enrollment for the new high school in western Loudoun is 1008 students.  That number is for 3 grades (no seniors this year).  Assuming each class is 1/3 of 1008, that would mean next year, when the school has all 4 grades, they will be operating at ~84% capacity.


LL, If you concede 5,000 people are coming, it is difficult to understand why you don’t think new schools will eventually be needed.  Yes they aren’t needed now, but the eventual need seems pretty clear unless Loudoun issues a building moratorium.


Where was I?  In another county. 
Ok, so the 5,000 people won’t be in the center of town, but going up and down small country roads.  Is that better?  or worse? 
I am well aware that county numbers are not to be trusted.  So what?  They will use them anyway, to justify building three new schools that aren’t needed.


Lovettsville Lady- With all due respect, although you may be close on the desired time lines, painting a picture that 5,000 people will be in and out of Lovettsville is without a doubt blowing things out of proportion.
First, the “projections” you give are from LCPS school staffers who have but one goal: to inflate estimates in order to get what they want. They have over and under estimated population numbers before and will do so again. For that, Loudoun has half empty schools in one area and overcrowded schools in others.
As far as all the school traffic going through Lovettsville? Well, that’s also inaccurate.
The schools will not be in town, but a mile or two outside of town… most likely south of the town. There will be no schools adjacent to the town except the one that already exists on Loudoun Street. Happy now?
Also, if there is a reason to yell “Fire!” it should be for the amount of subdividing the developers have managed to quietly get approved in and around the town over the past 10 years. If I were you, I’d save my energy for when the economy changes and the builders decide to loosen their belts. They will surely make Lovettsville look like a construction zone and there’s absolutely nothing you or anybody else will be able to do about it.
Oh, and for all those who have been screaming and crying about no schools in town… where where you when the county approved the massive amount of residential subdivisions that have yet to be built?


>>>No one is suggesting building a new high school.  The immediate goal is simply buying the land for a future school.  Seems the smartest thing the county could do now is PLAN LAND USE, i.e. decide the best place for ALL future schools, identify possible properties, obtain public input, then either purchase that land or negotiate right of first refusal while it is a buyers market. Buying land in emergency situations never benefits the taxpayer. <<<

That is SO not true.  They most definitely ARE intending to build three schools in Lovettsville within the next few years.  The elementary school will completed within two years, 2012, middle school three years laterm by 2015, and the high school completed in 7 years, 2017.  All three schools over the next 7 years, with a projected over 4,000 students and over 1,000 staff.  Five thousand people in and out of Lovettsville everyday.  The bonds have been approved.  The full report is here:  http://cmsweb1.loudoun.k12.va.us/509905169119/lib/509905169119/HS-10 Lovettsville May 08 the end2.pdf


Thanks Ricky. I didn’t know about about those additional details, and I’m sure there are many more details out there that this paper is too afraid to publish. If anyone would like to add to this, please feel free to do so. It’s really up to the citizens of this area to bring these dirty deeds to the surface. We obviously can’t depend on our school officials or our local papers to do so.


Ready to Rumble has summarized the history well.  When Neil and Ava didn’t want to sell to LCPS, Hatk/Adam leaked their interest to Sal via Chapm, who told his former client Sal that if Sal acquired the land, Adam would buy it and pay a high enough price to more than cover all Sal’s legal fees and still turn a sweet profit.  (Attorney/client priviledge protects all the scumbags.)  That’s why Adam has worked so hard and has spent so much of Loudoun taxpayers’ money to get Wheatland.  He is in the perfect position to kill any other deals that could interfere with their scumbag plan.  And that’s The Rest of The Story.


Here’s the truth of the matter:
The timeline really begins with the contract for the Grubb property in Wheatlands about a year prior to the Cangiano contract. The Wheatland neighbors, among other folks who knew better, brought all the “cons” to the Supervisors who had only been given the “pros” by the LCPS’ staffers.
The Board of Supervisors then decided not to finance that acquisition and the school board had to terminate the contract.
As far as the Cangiano parcels are concerned, the LCPS’ staffers were sniffing around that property before he ever took possession of it. They had made contact with Ava Abramowitz, one of Wheatland’s owners, to sell them that property prior to the settlement of Cangiano’s lawsuit. (Side Note: Neil Racham did not want Wheatlands to be developed and only wanted to sell the property to a conservancy. So, Cangiano created a conservancy and put a contract on Neil and Ava’s land. Once Neil found out Cangiano was behind the conservancy, he wanted out. Cangiano sued them for breach of contract. They settled right before the judge was to give his ruling. Neil and Ava got divorced.)
As far as cost per acre? This article accidentally misleads the reader into thinking that the price per acre ended up being $47,500. Yes, that was the average, but it was not the amount that was going to be paid to the Burgess family. They were to get $147,000 per acre. Why? because the 10 acres had been subdivided into 3 lots. Two of which were family subdivided into their children’s names through gifting, then put back into the parent’s names once the 1 year holding time was up. Which, by the way, is not illegal but definitely not kosher.
All these slimy details I’ve mentioned leading up to the Cangiano contract are nothing compared to the way the Miller’s in Lovettsville were treated by the school board’s staffers when negotiating on their land.
How would you feel if someone came to you with an offer to buy your property, and if you didn’t take that offer…they would legally try to take it through the equivalent of Eminent Domain or Condemnation?
That’s how the Millers were treated, and it appears to be the reason the Millers broke off negotiations.
LCPS had a prime opportunity and purposely chose not to negotiate, in good faith, on that land because they apparently wanted Wheatlands all along.
Ok, you get the point. I’m tired of typing and I know you’re tired of reading the filth Loudoun County citizens have been faced with over the years.
One last thought though: It is not the Board of Supervisors who have ruined these deals. The fault lies with the School Board’s majority for allowing the staffers to run wild all over Loudoun offering owners like Grubb, Cangiano, and Greenvest big money for land that either is not right for schools, or simply nowhere near the exorbitant amount the LCPS is willing to dole out. In my humble opinion, the BoS is simply keeping the majority of School Board from making horrendous mistakes that would eventually end up costing the taxpayers millions in wasted funds. You may want to re-read the Loudoun Times article to determine which school board members are worth keeping and which are to be tossed. I’ll give you a hint: those who did not want to pursue Wheatlands in the article’s May 26th timeline may be the ones worth keeping ;-)


Lovettsville Lady,
No one is suggesting building a new high school.  The immediate goal is simply buying the land for a future school.  Seems the smartest thing the county could do now is PLAN LAND USE, i.e. decide the best place for ALL future schools, identify possible properties, obtain public input, then either purchase that land or negotiate right of first refusal while it is a buyers market. Buying land in emergency situations never benefits the taxpayer.


Not to worry LL, my prediction is LCPS has no intention of buying either remote property.  LCPS will happily pay thousands for those surveys and other studies all so they can later say, “Cangiano is the only place that will work for HS-10”.  Unfortunately buying a piece of Cangiano for an elementary school appears imminent, instead of considering the superior site in Hillsboro offered in a RFP response.  That site is next to the existing elementary school and fronts on two paved roads.  The good old boy system is alive and well, Hatrick gives Cangiano gets the best residential development amenity money can buy.


The surveying is being done for schools in one of two locations, Britain Road where it hits Picnic Woods road and parcels at Fry Farm and Lutheran Church Road.  Of course we don’t need those new schools, but that won’t stop the school board from overpaying for land they don’t need.
More here: http://virginiavirtucon.wordpress.com/2010/07/24/new-schools-in-lovettsville/
and here: http://www.class-now.org/news


I’d love to know what the latest on the school situation is.  A lot of road surveying work was done along Axline Road/Householder Road/Lutheran Church in Lovettsville over the past 30 days but I haven’t seen any stories in the papers of what solution is being investigated and by whom.

Most Popular in News
Monday, May. 21 | 7606 views
Leesburg high schools switch things around
Stay
Connected

Follow Us
on Twitter

News | Sports

Like Us
on Facebook

News & Sports

Subscribe
via RSS

News | Sports

Join Our
Email List

Sign up for
weekly updates
The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Open the e-edition now.
View our other print publications available online.

Weekly
Homes Guide

2011 Guide
to Loudoun

Holiday
Gift Guide

Health and
Wellness

Bridal
Guide

Historic Frederick
Maryland

Taste
of Loudoun

Senior
Lifestyles

Historic Downtown Leesburg

Future
Leaders

Coming
Soon

Coming
Soon

Northern VA Job Openings

More Northern VA Jobs