Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Loudoun Times-Mirror

2016 Year in Review: A new Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

First-year Loudoun County Chairwoman Phyllis Randall (D). Times-Mirror File Photo
After nearly two decades under former Chairman Scott York's leadership, Loudoun residents in 2015 elected Phyllis Randall (D), a mental health therapist by profession and the first African American to lead the Board of Supervisors.

Randall’s election came when she characterized the county as “us and them,” highlighting what she felt was a years-running disconnect between county government and the people it served.

The chairwoman's first year in office has been characterized by the ever-present issues of growth and transparency, as well as a broader definition of the board's role in the community.

Growth and development

Since taking office, Randall and new board members have delved into the arduous process of managing growth and development.

Over the past year the board’s primary focus has been working on putting together the county’s new comprehensive plan, which will serve as the blueprint for development throughout Loudoun for the next decade and beyond. Supervisors have also been preparing for Loudoun’s new Silver Line Metro stations by crafting a small area land use plan around the area.

As more applications for high-density residential housing have come before the board, overcrowding of communities and schools has been a challenge for supervisors. Balancing economic development while still maintaining the rural character of western Loudoun has been another focus – one Randall has advocated for.

The board’s vote to overturn a county commission permit for a controversial "telephone transmission utility substation" proposed by AT&T in western Loudoun highlighted the board’s commitment to the county’s current comprehensive plan and protection of rural western Loudoun.

However, the board also approved over a dozen rural uses in western Loudoun for new business and tourism opportunities, as well as a special events facility in Middleburg.

The social cost of growth

In a county that has nearly doubled in size in the last 20 years, Randall has been quick to acknowledge that with tremendous growth comes a wealth of other challenges, as the needs of the people in the community grow too.

As a corporate board, the role of supervisors has been largely considered one solely responsible for adopting ordinances, appropriating funds, approving land use and rezoning applications and building infrastructure.

Randall has tried to redefine that role.

The chairwoman has admitted that because of the county’s rapid growth, Loudoun’s focus has been overwhelmingly on transportation and economic development. She contends the county has lacked focus on resources for the county's less fortunate population.

“There is no doubt Loudoun is a county that is thriving – making its mark on the national, and even international, stage,” Randall said at her first State of the County address in May. “However, it is equally clear that the success story that is Loudoun is not enjoyed or felt by all of Loudoun’s residents. In Loudoun, we have not just pockets, but entire communities of people who don't feel heard, seen or valued.”

Domestic violence, teen suicide, inequality, racism and discrimination and gun violence have been issues Randall has attempted to tackle as the new chairwoman of that board – issues that previous chairs had not always prioritized.

Despite her efforts, political ideologies often stood in the way of Randall's attempts.

“If we, who are the leaders of the county, can't have the discussion, then who does?” Randall told the Times-Mirror following a highly politicized vote on a gun a violence awareness day resolution. The board's three Democrats voted in favor of the resolution while the six Republicans opted to table the measure.

Following a deadly mass shooting at a gay-friendly nightclub in Orlando, Florida, over the summer, the board attempted to take up a resolution introduced by Supervisor Kristen Umstattd (D-Leesburg) to recognize the month of June as LGBT pride month.

Consideration on that resolution, however, was pushed back to a later meeting and subsequently changed to a substitute proclamation by Supervisor Ron Meyer (R-Broad Run) to recognize the month of July as “Love Loudoun Month” -- a broad proclamation that honored citizens of all faiths, ethnic groups and sexual orientation in Loudoun.

Before they could vote on the resolution, Republican supervisors argued it was not their job as a corporate body to discuss such controversial and political issues.
Randall disagreed.

“I don’t see these discussions as being a bad thing, I see these discussions as being the way the community talks to the board and talks to each other,” Randall said from the dais in July during discussion of Meyer’s resolution. “Perhaps you didn’t have any resolutions that were controversial because when someone in the county asked somebody on the board to bring it up on last the board, no one brought it forward, thus it wasn’t any controversy.”

Meyer’s resolution ultimately passed, and Randall said the board would not revisit Umstattd's LGBT resolution.

Transparency

Less than a month into office, supervisors approved an ethics code at the recommendation of Randall -- a policy that had been at the core of her campaign for chairwoman.

Over the years Loudoun boards have been criticized for their cozy dealings with land and real estate developers as well as political donors.

The ethics code, crafted by supervisors in a bipartisan manner, included avoiding the appearance of any conflicts of interest, not granting political favors and using county resources wisely.

The board continues to come under scrutiny for its dealings on economic development ventures, approvals of land use applications and groups they appoint that help craft county policy.

Randall recently offered a chair’s prerogative directing land use and development applicants to have all materials and adjustments to their applications in before the board’s packets are made public. Randall's proposal is a bid to prevent applicants from making last-minute changes to their applications without giving the public or supervisors time to understand the information.

“This is my first term as chair, and it bothers me. So if it bothers me I’m thinking it might bother the public also,” Randall told the Times Mirror.


Supervisors and county staff still hold closed-door, executive sessions at nearly every business meeting.

In November, Loudoun’s Department of Economic Development, Visit Loudoun, Randall and Congresswoman Barbara Comstock (R) joined a high-level delegation of Chinese and U.S. officials on a tour of local eateries and breweries without the knowledge of the public or the local media.

Loudoun has over 40 advisory boards, commissions and committees, whose membership largely consists of board appointees.

The Zoning Ordinance Action Group is one of those groups. It considers consequential zoning and planning decisions that impact the county's growth. The members consist largely of development and building industry insiders, some of whom have applications directly before the board.

“I am, to be honest, a little concerned that there are members of ZOAG who ... actually have applications that come before our board and that some of the recommendations they make on ZOAG could impact their own application,” Randall told the Times-Mirror.

Randall said although she would like to see more citizen representation on ZOAG, it is up to supervisors to choose its leadership.

Supervisors held their final business meeting on Dec. 6 and will reconvene for its first business meeting of the year on Jan. 3.

Comments


Here is a good,  recent article on the subject of data center water consumption.  .  As it states, the consumption of water in the creation of the electricity that ultimately gets consumed by the servers in the data center are the lions share of the overall water use.  If you were think of all land developments in that same sense, it would make all those hotels, all those Walmarts, and really, all of our homes, much higher water consumers than generally thought of.  Just goes to show, few of us understand the actual footprint that we as individuals create.

To all those anti-data center folks - stop using the internet if you don’t like them. Vote with the tool you got. Go back to reading magazines and newspapers, ordering items from order slips and mailing it with a check, and watching the Weather Channel and nightly news. And stop commenting on this forum, which after all, only exists because of data centers.


BobO brings up a good point.  What has improved in Loudoun in the past year?  What has improved in the past 5 years?  While I very much like Loudoun, I’d be hard pressed to say there have been any improvements in the past 5 years other than a handful of key road projects being completed (but don’t nearly compensate for the increase in traffic)

RQS, Data centers are certainly better than houses.  Green space is better, but green space can always have houses put on it by-right.  Data centers are huge water hogs.  I was stunned when reading in LTM that they consume something like 5-7% of all Loudoun’s water consumption, which necessitates increased water utility expansion, growth that gets charged back to consumers in water bills.  You say that they pay a ton of taxes, but I thought they get all kinds of tax exemptions (but I could be wrong about that).  I’d say their biggest detractor is that they are ugly.  Keep ugly in eastern Loudoun where it thrives and keep western Loudoun beautiful.


With all due respect for commissions, committees, progress efforts and plans were any of the following improved?
1 traffic
2 Reductions in Unfair assessments
3 Improvement in the ability of the county to support schools by less high density residential development relative to the tax base?
4 Fairly tax hospitals, golf courses and non-profits (like HHMI) and other tax avoidance organizations
5 Improve the fairness of the composite index?
6 Better service from VDOT or at least have them meet their own published minimums?
No - I thought not.
Bob O__ Esq.


I think we forgot two major events.

1. Randall is currently facing civil rights violations in federal court.

2. Even though she ran on an ethics pledge, Randall refused to recommend one for LCSB. Then, just months later, special prosecutors assigned to investigate LCSB members discovered laws were broken.

I think these warrant inclusion in any “year in review”.


I am very curious as to what those reasons are (and those held by so many people who speak negatively about them).  I’d really like to know what land use someone would RATHER have than a data center (and don’t say “public green space”, that’s not development).


I’m not a fan of all the data centers for numerous reasons, but they’re a WAY better option than high density housing or more of those damnable “mixed-use developments”.


What’s wrong with data centers? Why would they be a poor land use choice in Western Loudoun? They produce no children, they produce very little traffic due to the very low employee count, they pay a ton of taxes on all the equipment and land. They produce some noise from all the cooling equipment, but that’s not much of an impact given the lack of those normally produced by development (kids, traffic, service requirements).

The thing draw and keep data centers where they are is the presence of infrastructure necessary to serve them (fiber lines, electricity, water).


“leadership”


It would be helpful if there was clarification on Ms. Randall’s comment to the west about the east saying “stupid” things to her all the time.  I know she apologized, but is there anymore information on what she said then and this article.


She’s going to have an uphill battle when you’ve got Buddy Ruzek head of economic development bragging about his #datacenteralley!  What a disgrace - I wonder how many of these are going to end up in Western Loudoun?! There is no commitment to slow growth it’s all BS!


Other than the grammatical errors (of which I have myself committed many times) there seems to be a hint by the reporter of a certain heavy handedness by Chair Randall.  And I note the hypocritical posturing of Chair Randall who proudly proclaimed she would not go London on an economic trip, but went to Asia on an economic trip. Overseas is overseas, and is not dependent on which direction you go.  And, this year also saw Chair Randall consistently voting for more houses; hardly the sign of someone who is concerned about too much growth in the County. Overall, Chair Randall has barely gotten a C- as a grade in this, her first year.


“In a county that has nearly doubled in size in the last 20 years…”

Population has doubled in 20 years.  Has Loudoun’s infrastructure kept pace?  Have we doubled road capacity in the past 20 years?

Developers always want more NOW (strike while the fire is hot).  But that isn’t prudent given Loudoun’s antiquated infrastructure.  Development isn’t bad, but Loudoun badly needs a breather and we need to slow-roll any new development so that we aren’t stuck in traffic forever.  Being stuck in traffic isn’t something developers care about because it is no skin off their back.  But real people pay a severe penalty for Loudoun’s unbalanced growth: more traffic, more taxes, more headaches.

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at ltmeditor@loudountimes.com.

More News

As Seen IN PRINT
The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Click here for all e-editions.
Email UPDATES