Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Loudoun Times-Mirror

EDITORIAL: The right to know comes home at Montpelier

"All men having power ought to be mistrusted to a certain degree."
James Madison at the Constitutional Convention, July 11, 1787


Just as the Times-Mirror is distributed to homes and sites throughout Loudoun County on Thursday, the newspaper’s editor will be speaking at James Madison’s home in Orange County on an enduring idea about newspapers and government. Executive Editor Dale Peskin joins a group of business leaders and attorneys at Montpelier for a discussion about the public’s right to know. The discussion is being conducted by the Virginia Coalition for Open Government.

As a monument to James Madison, our fourth president and father of our Constitution, Montpelier engages citizens with the legacy of Madison’s most powerful idea: government by the people.

Madison turned government on its head. He and his peers envisioned a new nation with a limited power that served the people equally. But it was Madison who created the framework for making it work. The social contract described by the Declaration of Independence, in which the people hold the government accountable and the law applies to all citizens equally, was a lofty goal until the Constitution prescribed a system of government that could be kept in check on all fronts.

With the core ideas of the Constitution, the Federalist Papers and the Bill of Rights, Madison set the principles for the people’s right to know. His first and best idea is the First Amendment. Madison’s framework for the American Experiment is still important today.

The topic at Montpelier is this: the confidentiality of business information. The discussion considers whether private enterprises conducting business with governments are entitled to withhold information from the public.

We understand this topic well in Loudoun County, where developers regularly tease planners, the county’s economic marketers and our elected officials with elaborate schemes, dreams and high-priced projects. Developers influence decisions with advocates they pay to advise decision makers. They make strategic campaign contributions. County supervisors typically comply with requests to negotiate with them behind closed doors, outside the scrutiny of the public or the press.

The Virginia Coalition for Open Government is particularly interested in discussing the Times-Mirror’s coverage of AT&T’s project on Short Hill Mountain. Earlier this year, the newspaper disclosed the construction of communications facilities for the federal government on top of Short Hill, and later, inside the mountain.

Residents in the valley below still want to know what’s going on. Evidence obtained by the Times-Mirror suggests that a secret, communications relay station is being constructed inside the mountain, once a secure federal bunker built to withstand a nuclear attack. But AT&T isn’t saying much, and county officials are holding whatever knowledge they have close to the vest. Documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request were redacted to obscure clarifying details of the project.

Should AT&T have to disclose information about the project to the public?

Should county officials disclose dealings with AT&T and the federal government about the project?

Does the Times-Mirror have an obligation to ferret out the facts and inform citizens of the county?

The answer is an unequivocal “Yes.” Because James Madison said so.

Comments


Callme, this has to do with local newspapers being so scared of the local government bodies that they refuse to report on:

1. special prosecutors being assigned to investigate misconduct by local officials. 

2. Said special prosecutors issuing opinions that confirm local officials violated the law and directing them to comply in the future

Now, exactly who do you think violated the law?  And exactly who do you think they threatened with blacklisting if it was reported in the local news?

We shall find out soon, won’t we?


Oh, SGP, this is not about you.  Give us a break.  Not everything has to do with you being scolded for obnoxious behavior, getting banned from you child’s schools.


So let me get this straight.  LTM has an “obligation to ferret out the facts and inform citizens of the county” on Short Hill Mountain but not other public trust issues?  How many times has LTM reported on:

1. The federal civil rights complaint against Commonwealth Attorney Plowman

2. LCSB members violating the conflict of interest act

3. Loudoun BOS unconstitutionally censoring citizens (another federal civil rights charges)

4. LCPS banning parents from their kids’ school for criticizing them at PTA meetings and board meetings

5. Loudoun’s Commonwealth Attorney office failing to prosecute indisputable perjury despite the Virginia State Police stating the claim was “legitimate” and well-documented

Are you seriously suggesting you are “looking out” for the public by challenging unethical actions of our local government?

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at ltmeditor@loudountimes.com.

More News

As Seen IN PRINT
The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Click here for all e-editions.
Email UPDATES