Judge denies McDonnells’ request to dismiss case
The couple's attorneys argued in court that the prosecution had failed to prove the McDonnells had violated any laws. Prosecutors argued that they'd provided more than enough evidence during the first three weeks of trial to back up the charges.
Judge James R. Spencer denied the motions after more than an hour of debate.
The McDonnells are charged with accepting more than $165,000 in gifts and loans from Jonnie Williams, the former CEO of a dietary supplements maker, in exchange for promoting his company's products. They could face decades in prison if convicted.
The defense's arguments Friday were similar to those of its past unsuccessful court motions. Specifically, lawyers argued that McDonnell had done nothing to provide Williams with anything of real value other than set up meetings and attend events. Defense attorney Ryan Newman said prosecutors are interpreting the law too broadly, in a way that could criminalize routine political courtesies and put other politicians at risk for prosecution.
"The line must be clearer than that," Newman said.
Spencer rejected that argument and said he would provide a written explanation at a later time.
The defense is set to begin presenting its case Monday.
Spencer also said he would rule later on whether questionnaires filled out by the jury prior to being seated for the trial should be made public. The request, made by media organizations, was opposed by both prosecutors and the defense.
Post a commentCommenting is not available in this channel entry.
Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at [email protected].
- Ashburn couple indicted in $20M visa fraud scheme
- EDITORIAL: Sister cities bring junkets and jokes, not economic development
- Trump campaign chairman in Virginia to run for governor
- As Purcellville confronts more growth, mayor and council races turn contentious
- Significant premium hikes expected under Obama health law—especially in Va.