Local judge puts Eugene Delgaudio case on hold
It's now up to the Supreme Court of Virginia to assign a substitute judge to the case. Any action on the matter is at a standstill until the state's high court does so.
Mr. McCahill's decision comes a week after a group of Sterling residents, many of whom are part of the anti-Delgaudio group “Sterling Deserves Better,” filed a recall petition in the local circuit court to remove Mr. Delgaudio from the seat he's held for 15 years. The residents and their legal representative, attorney John Flannery, listed as reasons for Mr. Delgaudio's dismissal alleged “misuse of office” and “incompetence." The petitioners say Mr. Delgaudio's actions have negatively impacted the function of county government.
Tuesday, Mr. McCahill informed those present in a Loudoun County courthouse room -- including Mr. Delgaudio and his attorney Charles King; Nicole Wittmann, an assistant to the Loudoun County commonwealth's attorney; and Mr. Flannery -- that he has been in contact with officials at the state Supreme Court to let them know he'll be seeking a recusal for all Loudoun County Circuit Court judge.
After the 15-minute hearing, Mr. Flannery opined the state Supreme Court may act quickly, as soon as this week, in appointing a new judge.
The judge's action Tuesday leaves undetermined whether Loudoun Commonwealth's Attorney Jim Plowman will be granted his own recusal in the case. It's expected, however, that Mr. Plowman, an elected official of the same political party as Mr. Delgaudio, will not be forced to serve as prosecutor in the case.
Mr. McCahill's primary objective at Tuesday's hearing, it appeared, was to get an estimate of how long a trial on the case may take; Mr. King suggested up to 10 days, while the other parties said roughly a week.
Through his attorney, Mr. Delgaudio expressed that he'd prefer a non-jury trial.
Mr. King clarified his comment after the hearing, however, saying, “When Judge McCahill asked if I was requesting a jury trial, I told him not at this time ... When asked again about a jury trial, I said a decision about a jury trial has not been made.”
“This case was only filed last week and the decision about whether to request trial by jury is one of the important decisions a litigant can make,” Mr. King said.
This story has been updated from an earlier version.
Post a commentCommenting is not available in this channel entry.
Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- EDITORIAL: The right to know comes home at Montpelier
- Ashburn man who murdered estranged wife receives life sentence
- Report: State salaries to lag private sector by 27 percent
- Pacific Boulevard extension opens as Ashburn man waits for eminent domain trial
- EXCLUSIVE: LCPS officials recommended Dominion teacher for new job after ‘alleged incident’
|The Loudoun Times-Mirror
is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.Open the e-edition now.