Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Loudoun Times-Mirror

Loudoun County Public Schools wins FOIA lawsuit

A Loudoun County General District judge ruled in favor of Loudoun County Public Schools March 4 in a case between the school system and a Lovettsville resident.

Sarah Stinger accused Wayde Byard, the public information officer for Loudoun County County Public Schools, and Stephen DeVita, the school's district counsel, of violating the Freedom of Information Act. Judge Deborah C. Welsh denied Stinger's Writ of Mandamus, stating that LCPS responded reasonably to Stinger's information request.

“Nothing has been presented to the court that the information isn't subject to availability,” Welsh said.

Stinger submitted her FOIA request after a statement made by Sam Adamo, the executive director of planning and legislative services for Loudoun County Public Schools. During a Jan. 2 School Board meeting, Adamo said the district had spent $1.7 million to $2 million searching for sites in western Loudoun for future schools HS-10, MS-10 and ES-25 with nothing to show for it. His comment prompted inquiries from multiple School Board members and a FOIA request from Stinger.

Stinger made her initial request Jan. 5 to Byard and after some confusion between the two, then sent another email Jan. 21 specifying she wanted all information electronically regarding the three schools. Stinger explained in court she believed electronically would be the easiest and cheapest method.
Byard then told Stinger the cost to retrieve the information would be $415.70.

According to Thomas Yetter, director of Financial Services for LCPS, retrieving the information would have required a senior accountant to extract the data from the 30-year-old FAMIS software system. The information would then have had to be reformatted to Excel, a process that would take an entire day.

“You have to download the data and reformat it manually,” Yetter explained to the court.

Stinger mailed Byard a $90 check, believing that to be enough to cover the costs of her requests. Byard mailed it back, telling her it was insufficient.

Stinger's attorney Robert Onheiser, a former LCPS School Board member, argued the school district has demonstrated a “particularized resistance” in getting Stringer information. Stringer previously took LCPS to court under FOIA and filed a complaint with the Department of Education in 2011.

But Julia Judkins, the counsel for the defense, said the history was irrelevant.

“By their own pleadings and stipulations, the focus is only on the Jan. 21 FOIA requests,” Judkins said.

Welsh agreed.

“The Court doesn't have anything to say the cost of $415.70 is unreasonable,” Welsh said. “While your request is reasonable, the School Board's response is also reasonable.”

Stringer still feels the fee is unreasonable and plans to move her inquiry to the School Board.

“They did not make a reasonable response to my request. They gave me a big number so I'd go away,” Stinger said. “They weren't willing to work with me.”


I don’t care a bit about the 90 dollars or the 415 dollars. If Sam looked at 20 sites he would of had to spend a hundred thousand dollars evaluating each site to spend that much money. Fees be darned I want to see a accounting of the 2 million dollars and what it paid for.

He was certainly highly qualified due to his past knowledge of LCPS financial and land acquisition operations.

interesting that Bob O is her lawyer….perhaps he still has an axe to grind?

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at ltmeditor@loudountimes.com.

More News

The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Click here for all e-editions.