Mobile Website | Login | Register
Staff Directory | Subscribe | About Us
Business Government Politics Region Crime/Public Safety Education People E-edition Ashburn Hamilton Hillsboro Lansdowne Leesburg Lovettsville Middleburg Purcellville River Creek Round Hill Sterling
Basketball Football Youth Wrestling Gymnastics Swimming Volleyball Baseball Track Golf Cheer Cross Country Schedule Scores
Brambleton Community of Faith Hangin in the Nosebleeds Journal Entry Loudoun Essence Made in Loudoun Odd Angles River Creek & Lansdowne South Riding Sterling, Cascades & CountrySide
This Week's Slideshow Browse All Galleries Your Best Dish Featured Video The Virginians
  • Announcements
  • Autos
  • Jobs
  • Legals
  • Homes
  • YardSales
  • Submit an Ad
  • Newspaper Advertising Online Advertising
    Classified listings Homes section

    Sterling woman sentenced to eight years in prison for toddler’s death

    Vanesa Cruz

    The nine-year saga of a dead Sterling girl has reached its conclusion, after the child's mother was sentenced to 10 years for her death.

    Vanesa Patricio Cruz, 32, was sentenced to 10 years in jail, with two years suspended, for her role in the 2005 death of 20-month-old Jocelin Guitierrez. After two mistrials, Cruz pleaded no contest Jan. 16 to the amended charge of voluntary manslaughter.

    A no contest plea means that Cruz neither admits nor disputes the charge. Though it is not a guilty plea, it offers the same immediate results as a guilty plea.

    While the charge of voluntary manslaughter typically carries a maximum of five years and eight months, Judge Burke McCahill significantly deviated, citing the parent/child relationship and noting that parents are supposed to protect the child.

    The case first began Aug. 13, 2005, when Cruz and her long-time boyfriend and now common-law husband Jalacio de la Cruz rushed Jocelin to a South Riding Safety Center after the toddler collapsed in the parking lot of Santee Trucking, where de la Cruz worked. The baby was taken to Inova Fair Oaks Hospital, where she was later pronounced dead.

    The case was considered “cold,” but was reopened in 2011 by Detective Wayne Promisel. In 2012, Cruz was taken to the police station, where after more than an hour, she tearfully confessed to hitting her daughter in the head with a remote control.

    Cruz was arrested and charged with second degree murder, felony homicide and felony child abuse and neglect.

    The crux of the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office case was in both the confession and an autopsy report that indicated bruising on the baby's brain. Additionally, medical reports indicated Jocelin had suffered from prior rib fractures. Cruz's public defenders argued that the confession and the techniques used to acquire it were questionable and that the medical evidence did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the child was abused. Rather, they said, Jocelin could have fallen and hit her head on the pavement, causing the bruising and leading to her death.

    After numerous pre-trial hearings, the matter finally made it to court in May last year. But after a bailiff honored the jury's request for a ruler, Judge Burke McCahill was forced to grant the defense's motion for a mistrial.

    All items used by the jury in deliberation must first be vetted by the court.

    The case again went to trial in December, featuring two new witnesses for the defense, including Zhongxue Hua, a forensic pathologist from New York who testified that the child may have had an undiagnosed condition.

    After deliberating for four hours, the jury reported that they were unable to reach a unanimous verdict, once again forcing a mistrial.

    Though a third trial was slated for March, both sets of attorneys agreed to amend the murder charge to voluntary manslaughter. The felony homicide and felony child abuse charges were not pursued.

    Cruz has already spent more than two years in jail throughout the course of the two trials, meaning she will have six years left in prison. Additionally, because she is illegally living in the country, she faces deportation back to Mexico at the conclusion of her sentence.


    Granny: I’m not sure your correct. While Virginia does not have its own common law marriages, it does recognize them if they were valid where they took place and if they were between people who would have been eligible to marry under Virginia law.

    Common law husband?? The state of Virginia does not recognize common law marriages..

    Get Email Updates


    Follow Us
    on Twitter

    News | Sports

    Like Us
    on Facebook

    News & Sports

    Join Our
    Email List

    Sign up for
    weekly updates
    The Loudoun Times-Mirror

    is an interactive, digital replica
    of the printed newspaper.
    Open the e-edition now.

    Loudoun Business Journal - Spring 2015

    Readers Choice Winter 2014

    February 2015 Leesburg Downtown

    2014 Holiday Leesburg Downtown

    2014 Loudoun Holiday Gift Guide