Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Loudoun Times-Mirror

Study links transportation, economic growth in Washington metro area

Despite efforts to consolidate growth around transit centers, and to develop new transit centers, the Washington metropolitan area will remain very auto-dependent, according to a new report by the George Mason University Center for Regional Analysis.

The report, prepared by John McClain for the 2030 Group, links transportation and economic growth.

“We’re supporting economic growth in the center of our region by transit, but we still have a lot of growth outside the center that needs to be supported by roads,” McLain said, presenting an overview of his report at a Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance event last week.

The Washington region is expected to gain more than 1.3 million jobs during the next 30 years, according to the report. Tysons Corner is forecast to become the second largest activity center in the region by 2040, after downtown D.C. The Dulles corridor also is forecast to see significant growth as an employment center.

However, McLain said, “we may not realize that economic growth if we do not invest in our transportation infrastructure.”

The report emphasized the importance of road infrastructure to support economic growth.

During the last two decades, the percentage of people commuting by car has declined about 3 percent, according to the report, and McLain doesn’t expect that will change that much. His analysis predicts only a 1 percent bump in the share of commuters using transit during the next 40 years.

However, the Coalition for Smarter Growth, which advocates for the type of transit-centered mixed use development that Fairfax County is planning for Tysons Corner, said McLain’s analysis is flawed. They note that most of the members of the 2030 Group, which funded the study, are developers who may have a vested interest in growing the outer suburbs.

“While dressed up with an acknowledgment of transit, the report is focused on justifying a wasteful expansion of highways which would fuel more spread-out development and yet more traffic,” said Stewart Schwartz, executive director for CSG.

CSG believes that new trends in the real estate market and the lifestyle and transportation benefits will drive more growth to mixed use centers, rather than continuing the sprawling suburban development that defined the last few decades in the region.

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)



Northern va should secede from Virginia. Besides not getting our fair share in tax money back, they gave away the DTR which was suppose to go to a regular road after paid off(many years ago).

Yeah talk about redistribution of wealth.  No.VA gets about 19 cents back for every dollar sent to Richmond.  Bob McDonnell might be the most “socialist” governor on the union.

Loudoun County,

The real problem is NoVA does not get back the tax money it gives the state. We expect Richmond to fairly distribute funds but they do not. They always tell us to pound sand and raise taxes locally. We already fund most of VA with our taxes, time we got more funds here.

What if we split the state and kept our funds, what would central and south VA do then? They are just another poor southern state without us

The problem isn’t transportation, it is affordable housing. When new homes go up, they all start at $300k for townhomes and $500k for single family. Those people who work to serve you sandwiches at lunch time or ring up your food at the store can’t afford to live in this area. As a result, they must move further and further away, adding to the traffic on the roads. If you want to solve the transportation issue, you’ve got to solve the affordable housing issue.

Every time McLain or Stephen Fuller put out a “study” from GMU, it has a predictable conclusion that supports the desires of developers.  No surprise I guess, since the developers underwrite that place.

The analysis may be flawed, but then again, the Coalition For Smarter Growth, who makes that claim, has developers on their board as well (Ron Eichner, Leslie Steen).  These studies are always slanted toward the money that pays for them.  As for building roads - too late !  You’re supposed to build them first (build it and they will come).

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at ltmeditor@loudountimes.com.

More News

The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Click here for all e-editions.