Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Loudoun Times-Mirror

Loudoun supervisors vote along party lines to nix proposed Commission on Women and Girls

In a party-line vote, Loudoun's Board of Supervisors on Tuesday nixed the creation of a county Commission on Women and Girls.

Loudoun's six Republican supervisors opposed creating the new commission, saying it wasn't the role of the county's governing body to implement such a commission.

A Commission on Women and Girls was proposed by Chairwoman Phyllis Randall (D-At Large) to help Loudoun women pursue leadership opportunities in their communities and focus on issues such as cyber bullying, domestic violence, substance abuse and help young women pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields.

Randall would had been the advisor of the commission with 15 other Board of Supervisors-appointed members. Randall planned, at the end of her term, to hand the commission off to a private entity to lead.

But following the 2-6-1 vote against the commission, with Supervisor Koran Saines (D-Sterling) absent for the vote, Randall vowed to lead the commission on her own.

“I very much intend to do this initiative from the office of the chair,” Randall said. “I don’t want to be unclear and I don’t want to be coy, and I want to be up front with you all and I want to be up front with the people in loudoun: This is too important for me for it not to happen, this will absolutely happen.”

The first-term chairwoman said she planned to still use county facilities to hold meetings for her initiative, use taxpayer money from her district budget to fund it and post information about the initiative on county websites and through her chair newsletter.

Ahead of the vote, some GOP supervisors argued that, although they liked the idea of the Commission on Women and Girls, it was not the role of a corporate board to approve a commission that would advise them on issues unrelated to county business.

“I don’t think there’s any question that there are issues out there that we should be discussing that we should be taking action on,” Supervisor Matt Letourneau (R-Dulles) said. “It’s a question of what the role of the Board of Supervisors is, and it’s certainly to provide leadership in the community, but an advisory commission to the Board of Supervisors is, again, supposed to be giving specific advice and direction on matters that pertain to county business.”

Broad Run Supervisor Ron Meyer (R) agreed.

“I remember when I first read the idea itself it seemed something that was very you, which is not a bad thing,” Meyer told Randall. “It seemed like something that wasn't necessarily focused on what the county government’s operations are -- advising us to consider policies -- but instead, more of a leadership group that would try to recommend things to the general community outside of just our government functions.”

Meyer said he had actually proposed the idea to Randall to continue the initiative from her county office and not as an initiative under a constitutional body.

Comments


“Does this mean you oppose Barbara Comstock’s 10th Congressional District Young Women Leadership Program?”

Is it taxpayer funded?  Is it administered by the gov’t?  If so, then yes I’m opposed to it.


“Women are perfectly capable of being successful and obtaining leadership positions without special treatment and government coddling.”

Does this mean you oppose Barbara Comstock’s 10th Congressional District Young Women Leadership Program?


Women are perfectly capable of being successful and obtaining leadership positions without special treatment and government coddling.


The Commission on Women and Girls is a complete political farce. Government should not be in the position of deciding who should be our future leaders and apply a sexist leaning bias to the whole idea.

If Government wants women to advance into leadership roles, it shouldn’t do anything more than send a letter to LCPS to work on lifting the education level of “ALL STUDENTS” to be equipped with the skills to become leaders.

Chairwoman Randall needs to learn how to serve all the people and not play identity politics.


Another failure from Randall, number me among the surprised.  Such a sexist and demeaning proposal should have been shot down immediately and it looks like common sense has prevailed (this time at least!).


But wait, Randall and her attorney plead in court briefings that the Chairperson has “no other duties” except those authorized by the full board of supervisors.

Did Randall lie to the court or is she lying to the public now that she has the authority to do this?

For once, maybe Randall and her attorneys (hello Umstattd) should think about what they are doing before weaving such a tangled web.

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at [email protected].

More News

As Seen IN PRINT
The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Click here for all e-editions.
Email UPDATES