Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Loudoun Times-Mirror

UPDATED: Supervisors advance proposed ‘misuse of public assets’ ordinance

Update, July 18:

The Board of Supervisors on Wednesday unanimously approved sending the proposed ordinance criminalizing the misuse of public assets (detailed below) to a public hearing in September. At that meeting, held on the second Wednesday of the month, supervisors will likely suspend the rules and enact the new local law.

Original Story, July 16:

Loudoun's supervisors are expected tonight to take the next step toward making it a crime for members of the Board of Supervisors or other county bodies to misuse public assets, something they pledged to do in the aftermath of last year's final report from a special grand jury investigating Loudoun Supervisor Eugene Delgaudio (R-Sterling).

Delgaudio was not indicted on allegations he abused public resources, but a final summary from the grand jury stated the commonwealth's code “criminalizes such action only for 'full-time' employees … Because Loudoun County pays a nominal salary to members of the Board of Supervisors there is a general expectation that Board of Supervisors have another source of income … "

Delgaudio's colleagues and many political observers at the time were unaware the law criminalized misusing public assets only for “full-time employees.” Several supervisors vowed to work with local state lawmakers to draft an amendment to the state code so the misuse of public assets provision applies to all elected officials.

While state legislators did not agree to a proposal from state Del. Randy Minchew (R-10th) that would've applied the public assets prohibition to themselves – something that dismayed local supervisors – state lawmakers amended the code to allow jurisdictions to implement a local ordinance forbidding the abuse of public assets. Such an ordinance is what the board will take up July 16.

Under the proposal included in the Board of Supervisors business meeting packet, “any non-full-time officer, agent, employee or elected official, without lawful authorization, who misuses, or permits the misuse of, public assets for private or public purposes unrelated to the duties and office of that person, or any other legitimate governmental interest, when the value exceeds $1,000 in any 12-month period, shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and shall be fined not more than $2,500 or imprisoned not more than 12 months.

“'Public assets' is defined within the proposed ordinance as personal property belonging to or paid for by the county, or the labor of any person other than the accused that is paid for by the county.”

If supervisors approve a draft motion Wednesday, the proposed ordinance will be sent to a public hearing in September (the board is on recess in August), and could be finalized either at the public hearing or an ensuing business meeting.

Contact the writer at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).



Congressman Wolf recently spent five minutes on the House floor railing against his own Presbyterian church for passing resolutions against marriage discrimination and for divesting assets in Motorola, HP and Caterpillar. He brought a personal, sectarian dispute onto the public stage, and promoted his press release on his official Congressional web page. After he retires, he plans to work for the Colson Center/PFM/Manhattan Declaration and continue to bring the same sectarian purity struggles onto the public stage.

Supervisor Delgaudio publishes a quarterly self-promoting newsletter, spending >$20K/year to boast about himself and his achievements.

Dave LaRock has fluid social media outreach. He works it the other way. He acts from his government office and then promotes those actions from his campaign identity. Those promotions leverage Koch brothers issues/advocacy groups designed to collect names and personal information, not only for him, but for larger national campaigns.

Theo Stamos felt that this type of activity is politics as usual.

Because fundraising is so integral to politics, politicians have to triangulate every vote and that triangulation includes leveraging/recruiting volunteer resources and raising funds. The boundary between the personal campaign and public office is nonexistent.

Welcome to 2014.

A serious question(s).  Why does Ken Reid, who consumes massive amounts of food at various County functions, and offered at the County Building, not meet the criteria of misuse of county assets.  This is actually an honest question, since it has been noticed that Ken Reid seems to be living off of County food.  The second question is, when Ken Reid uses County funds to publish a “newsletter” that has a photo of Tom Dunn, who is running for mayor, and a photo of Susanna Fox, who is running for Leesurg Town Council, in that newsletter, both of whom Ken Reid is supporting in the Town of Leesburg elections, is that not a misappropriation of County funds?  Clearly, Ken Reid used his “newsletter” to promote the candidacy of Tom Dunn and Susanna Fox.  So, is there any real teeth in this effort, or is this just a pre-election game by the 9-0 republican board of supervisors?

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at ltmeditor@loudountimes.com.

More News

The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Click here for all e-editions.