Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Loudoun Times-Mirror

Supervisors to vote on new policy for their aides

Loudoun County supervisors’ staff aides may soon have a clear protocol to act if they have workplace complaints, but they still won’t be covered by the basic county grievance policy.

The Loudoun Board of Supervisors will discuss Dec. 5 a new proposal coming out of the board’s finance and government operations committee pertaining to the policies dealing with board aides and their employment.

This comes amidst the much-publicized controversy surrounding Supervisor Eugene Delgaudio (R-Sterling). Earlier this year, Delgaudio fired an aide after she approached county officials with allegations that Delgaudio directed her to set up political appointments while being paid by the county and using county resources.

The new proposed policy dictates that board aides may not, under any circumstance, use county resources – equipment, paid time, office space – to conduct political activities, including fundraising and campaigning.

Additionally, board aides are not to run any errands or do personal work for their individual supervisors outside their county-related responsibilities.

Supervisor Ralph Buona (R-Ashburn), chairman of the finance and government operations committee, said the recent review is essentially the first time board aide policies have been reviewed and revised, something that was past due.

“This provides for clear recourse if there’s a problem,” Buona said Dec. 3.

Under the proposed policy, aides with work-related complaints are to take their concerns to County Administrator Tim Hemstreet, who will take the issue to either the board’s chair or vice chair. Or, if the chair or vice chair are included within the complaint, the matter will be taken to the finance committee chair.

Buona said he’s pleased with his committee’s proposal, which he essentially wrote himself, he said.

“It’s definitely an improvement from what was in place before,” Buona said. “This was a very hard thing to put together.”

Board aides aren’t eligible for the same protections as other county employees under the county grievance policy, given the aides are by nature political appointees of elected officials, Buona said, referencing the Fair Labor Standards Act and the federal Hatch Act.

According to Loudoun County staff, in accordance with the Civil Rights Act, “the term ‘employee’ means an individual employed by an employer, except that the term ‘employee’ shall not include any person elected to public office in any State or political subdivision of any State by the qualified voters thereof, or any person chosen by such officer to be on such officer’s personal staff …”

Delgaudio, who sits on the committee, called the proposal “unconstitutional.” He questioned why, under the First Amendment, board aides couldn’t work for him in his private day job in order to earn more money.

A key point of the new policy disallows any board aide to work for a supervisor’s private work, another point that seems to correspond with allegations against Delgaudio.

At least one of Delgaudio’s aides can be seen in a video on YouTube staged by the supervisor’s non-profit organization, Public Advocate of the United States, a Southern Poverty Law Center-designated anti-gay hate group.

If the full board approves the proposed measures Dec. 5, the policy will go into effect Jan. 1, 2013.

Commented Board Chairman Scott York (R-At Large), “Now we’ve made it very clear what can and can’t be done.”

“So, everyone beware—because we will be watching,” York said.


I am curious why would putting an ethical policy together surrounding taxpayer funded aides be “a very hard thing to put together”?

This is a no brainer to most.  Further it has always been a policy that Board members can’t use aides for political marketeering.  Not sure why this is being made into a huge deal.  How about dealing with the real elephant in the room, Delgaudio.

Still can’t believe Delgaudio is being allowed to negotiate, debate, and vote on this policy.

Contrary to Mr. Delgaudio’s claims, there is nothing in the Constitution, and certainly nothing in the First Amendment, that could possibly be construed as a right of politicians to use their political aides for private benefit, such as when Delgaudio ordered his staff to spend 50-70% of their time raising money for a private organization. There is, however, a clear and well known provision of the First Amendment that guarantees freedom of religion, a provision Delgaudio allegedly violated when interviewing Donna Mateer.

This bizarre protest against reasonable efforts to regulate how Supervisors use county paid staff is further proof that Eugene Delgaudio needs to have his district budget suspended, as it is clear that he intends to continue using county paid staff for the benefit of his private organizations, including his hate group, Public Advocate of the United States.

The Board’s failure to limit the risk posed by Eugene Delgaudio makes them all accountable for any misconduct he engages in with regards to his county paid staff or his misuse of public office.

And the Board continues to allow Delgaudio to debate this issue and vote on it!!  Unbelievable.  Absolutely unbelievable.  Political protectionism at it’s finest.  This is nothing but feel good legislation.

Close them barn doors after the horse is gone, that’s Loudoun County Supervisors leading from behind for ya.
Now York is watching and I am sure everyone is quaking in their booties. Was he watching when his own aide Robin was doing Delgaudio’s aides work? It do appear that the progress was hampered by York and hopefully CA Theo Stamos will include Yorks stalling tactics in her investigation. Clarkes role in this is unclear but someone should have sided with Donna Mateer and it’s a shame that none of the other eight Supervisors championed her cause instead of trying to thawart it.

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at ltmeditor@loudountimes.com.

More News

The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Click here for all e-editions.