Mobile Website | Login | Register
Staff Directory | Subscribe | About Us
Business Government Politics Region Crime/Public Safety Education People E-edition Ashburn Hamilton Hillsboro Lansdowne Leesburg Lovettsville Middleburg Purcellville River Creek Round Hill Sterling
Basketball Football Youth Wrestling Gymnastics Swimming Volleyball Baseball Track Golf Cheer Cross Country Schedule Scores
Brambleton Community of Faith Hangin in the Nosebleeds Journal Entry Loudoun Essence Made in Loudoun Odd Angles River Creek & Lansdowne South Riding Sterling, Cascades & CountrySide
This Week's Slideshow Browse All Galleries Your Best Dish Featured Video The Virginians
  • Announcements
  • Autos
  • Jobs
  • Legals
  • Homes
  • YardSales
  • Submit an Ad
  • Newspaper Advertising Online Advertising
    Classified listings Homes section

    U.S. appeals court sets Va. same-sex case for May

    RICHMOND, Va. (AP) -- A federal appeals court has tentatively scheduled May arguments on Virginia's constitutional ban on same-sex marriages.

    The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals outlined a schedule Monday that will expedite the case to the Richmond court, with briefs scheduled for later this month.

    The 4th Circuit will hear appeals of a federal judge's ruling declaring the state's ban on same-sex marriages unconstitutional.

    The expedited review had been sought by two same-sex couples who challenged the ban as well as Attorney General Mark Herring.

    A federal judge in Norfolk declared the state ban unconstitutional but delayed enforcement of her ruling while it is appealed.

    That means gay couples in Virginia still can't marry until the case is ultimately resolved. The Virginia challenge could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.


    The lack of discrimination is not a marriage license.

    29% of the voting public does not equal “overwhelming” by the way, nor a mandate.

    The Marshall-Newman Amendment upholding traditional marriage passed in VA with 57% of the vote. To minimize this by saying that a lot of people who would have voted “no” didn’t exercise their right to vote is ridiculous. If you don’t vote, you don’t count. It’s as simple as that.

    You forget Troy, Virginians voted this definition into the Constitution.

    Wow that is a good one Fred.  So if gay marriage is legal, more people will apparently “decide” to be gay and not “produce future taxpayers”?  That is a good one.  You guys certainly have wild imaginations. 

    29% of the voting public does not equal “overwhelming” by the way, nor a mandate.  Maybe you can boohoo about two guys getting married in a country more sympathetic to your values, like Uganda or Iran.

    Nobody’s constitutional rights are being violated. The people of Virginia have clarified what constitutes a marriage. If you’ve chosen to not meet the requirements of the law, you don’t get a license.

    It doesn’t matter what the will of the Virginia voters is if it’s Un-Constitutional.

    Virginians overwhelming voted on the definition of marriage being One Man and One Woman. There is nothing prejudice about that or for a state to only acknowledge that as a valid marriage. It’s also a beneficial acknowledgement, as man/woman marriages produce future taxpayers, so it has an economic benefit to society. Hopefully the courts uphold the will of the voters in Virginia.

    Gay marriage and marijuana are being legalized at the same time.

    Lev 20:13 says that if a man lays with another man, he shall be stoned.
    All this time we’ve misinterpreted the Bible.

    Get Email Updates


    Follow Us
    on Twitter

    News | Sports

    Like Us
    on Facebook

    News & Sports

    Join Our
    Email List

    Sign up for
    weekly updates
    The Loudoun Times-Mirror

    is an interactive, digital replica
    of the printed newspaper.
    Open the e-edition now.

    Loudoun Business Journal - Spring 2015

    Readers Choice Winter 2014

    February 2015 Leesburg Downtown

    2014 Holiday Leesburg Downtown

    2014 Loudoun Holiday Gift Guide