Mobile Website | Login | Register
Staff Directory | Subscribe | About Us
Business Government Politics Region Crime/Public Safety Education People E-edition Ashburn Hamilton Hillsboro Lansdowne Leesburg Lovettsville Middleburg Purcellville River Creek Round Hill Sterling
Basketball Football Youth Wrestling Gymnastics Swimming Volleyball Baseball Track Golf Cheer Cross Country Schedule Scores
Brambleton Community of Faith Hangin in the Nosebleeds Journal Entry Loudoun Essence Made in Loudoun Odd Angles River Creek & Lansdowne South Riding Sterling, Cascades & CountrySide
This Week's Slideshow Browse All Galleries Your Best Dish Featured Video The Virginians
  • Announcements
  • Autos
  • Jobs
  • Legals
  • Homes
  • YardSales
  • Submit an Ad
  • Newspaper Advertising Online Advertising
    Classified listings Homes section

    Virginia lawmakers launch ‘Redskins Pride Caucus’

    The National Congress of American Indians, the oldest and largest American Indian and Alaska Native organization, calls “the ‘Redskins’ trademark disparaging to Native Americans” and claims it “perpetuates a centuries-old stereotype of Native Americans as ‘blood-thirsty savages,’ ‘noble warriors’ and an ethnic group ‘frozen in history.’”
    The week after a federal trademark board ruled the Washington Redskins nickname is “disparaging of Native Americans” and that the team's trademark protections should be canceled, three Northern Virginia state lawmakers today launched the Redskins Pride Caucus in Virginia's General Assembly.

    Republican state Dels. David Ramadan and Jackson Miller, of Loudoun and Manassas, respectively, and Democratic state Sen. Chap Petersen, of Fairfax City, said in their announcement the Redskins Pride Caucus is founded on four principles: “providing a voice for Redskins fans and season tickets holders;” supporting the Redskins franchise, a Virginia-based business headquartered in the Loudoun community of Ashburn; “opposing the inappropriate involvement of Congress in issues surrounding” the Redskins; and “supporting commercial freedom” in Virginia and “the rights of businesses to their own brands and intellectual property.”

    The decades-long debate on whether the term “Redskin” is a derogatory slur and the team should change its name has intensified over the past year, with members of Congress, including Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, labeling the term racist, offensive and urging the team's management to choose another mascot.

    President Barack Obama even weighed in last year, telling the Associated Press, “If I were the owner of the team and I knew that there was a name of my team — even if it had a storied history — that was offending a sizable group of people, I’d think about changing it.”

    The National Congress of American Indians, the oldest and largest American Indian and Alaska Native organization, calls “the ‘Redskins’ trademark disparaging to Native Americans” and claims it “perpetuates a centuries-old stereotype of Native Americans as ‘blood-thirsty savages,’ ‘noble warriors’ and an ethnic group ‘frozen in history.’”

    The Merriam-Webster dictionary also notes the word is an “usually offensive” term for “American Indians.”

    Del. Ramadan said to him the term represents a “great football team” and is “not disparaging to Native Americans.” An immigrant himself, Ramadan said he's sensitive to concerns of minorities and race.

    "There are some tribes that don't consider it offensive. Some say it represents a great history,” Ramadan said. The local lawmaker added that he became a fan of the Washington football team in 1987, before coming to America.

    When asked what the difference is between his weighing in on the team's name and the comments from Sen. Reid that he scorned, in terms of free speech, Ramadan said: “The difference is this a Virginia franchise, and we are Virginians. We are season-ticket holders. We are creating a voice that are going to defend our team and a Virginia business.”

    Last week's trademark ruling was the second time the patent board issued an opinion on the case. A similar ruling from 1999 was overturned in 2003. If the recent ruling stands – the football team's management has said it will appeal – the loss of trademark protection could, by some estimates, cost the football franchise millions of dollars a year in revenue.

    This screen grab was taken June 23 from a National Congress of American Indians website, http://www.changethemascot.org/



    Contact the writer at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

    Comments

    agree that this is not a political issue however the federal government has overstepped it’s boundaries on this one forcing politicians to weigh in. This is a privately owned business and the caucus is saying that private businesses can be controlled by the Feds.


    I’m with Cowbell on this one.  Go do your REAL job you were elected.  Not this cream puff.  The Redskins organization does not need ANY public official help in making money; they’ve done fine on their own.  Pay attention to YOUR job - taxes, roads, schools, crime, etc.  Pathetic.


    Why are any politicians even wasting their time on this subject? Do your job or resign. Why are all politicians clueless? Here’s an idea for the 3 moron politicians mentioned in the story. Go to Richmond and bring back more or our own tax money to northern VA….PERIOD!


    Here’s an idea… Let the season ticket holders vote on if the name should be changed.


    Amazing the lengths these politicians will go to…just to ensure they keep getting comped tickets to football games.  This is ridiculous.


    A Virginia franchise? Remind me where they play their home games again? And what’s that word commonly preceding the questionable moniker? Isn’t it Washington? Fight for old route 50? Not quite.

    Get Email Updates
    Tuesdays:  
    Thursdays:

    StayConnected

    Follow Us
    on Twitter

    News | Sports

    Like Us
    on Facebook

    News & Sports

    Join Our
    Email List

    Sign up for
    weekly updates
    The Loudoun Times-Mirror

    is an interactive, digital replica
    of the printed newspaper.
    Open the e-edition now.

    Loudoun Business Journal - Fall 2014

    Loudoun Business Journal - Summer 2014

    Loudoun Business Journal - Spring 2014