Welcome to LoudounTimes.com
Loudoun Times-Mirror

Virginia lawmakers still grappling with ethics law

The Virginia General Assembly is set to adjust the state's ethics laws for the fourth straight year, as lawmakers continue struggling over what kind of gifts they can take from lobbyists and special interests.

This year's efforts include clarifying that public officials cannot accept tickets to watch sporting events in luxury boxes and debating whether lobbyists who have a longstanding friendship with lawmakers should be able to give birthday and holiday gifts worth more than $100.

Spurred by a gift scandal that engulfed Gov. Bob McDonnell's final year in office, lawmakers have been writing and rewriting state gift laws since 2014. The big pushes came that year and in 2015, when lawmakers settled on a $100 a year gift cap from lobbyists, businesses and others.

But lawmakers are still trying to figure out what exactly a "gift" means. Del. Todd Gilbert, the House's point person on ethics legislation, said legislators want to find the right balance between upholding the public trust without making life so onerous for elected officials that no one wants to run for office. Putting that balance into code has so far been elusive.

"It's hard to legislate common sense," Gilbert said.

The row over luxury boxes is an example of those difficulties.

When lawmakers passed an ethics law in 2015, they publicly declared that the old days when special interests would woo lawmakers at luxury boxes at Washington Redskins' games or other events were over. The gift cap has an exception for certain ``widely attended'' events of 25 or more under certain circumstances, which lawmakers intended for things like Rotary Club dinners or NAACP banquets that lawmakers are expected to attend.

But staff at a newly formed ethics council last year gave permission to a top aide to Gov. Terry McAuliffe to accept an invitation from the Washington Redskins to watch a playoff game from one of the team's boxes, saying such an event qualified as a widely attended event. The team is in active discussions with state officials about building a new stadium in Virginia.

Republican lawmakers were in an uproar after The Associated Press first reported the gift. This year, both the House and the Senate have passed legislation aimed at tightening the law to exclude luxury boxes at sporting events. But the chambers so far remain in disagreement over gifts on special occasions from a lobbyist to lawmaker borne solely of friendship.

The Senate's version would exempt lobbyists and others from the $100 gift cap where there is a "bona fide personal relationship" and the "circumstances demonstrate that the motivation for the gift" is out of friendship, not because of the lawmaker's political position. The House makes no such exception for the gift cap.

McAuliffe's spokesman Brian Coy said the governor will review whatever final bill lawmakers settle on. Coy said any changes in the law need to "make government more transparent and accountable, not less."

The General Assembly has already killed an ethics reform McAuliffe said was a priority -- banning the personal use of campaign funds.


The headline of this story is evything that is wrong with our state and federal government.

Legislators “grappling” with ethics would be akin to Superman juggling Krytonite.  They have no ethics and if they did, they’d no longer have their super powers.

“it’s hard to legislate common sense”.  Let that sink in…. “Its hard to legislate common sense”

Can someone explain to me why a lawmaker SHOULD be allowed to accept gifts?

We should start with zero-base gifting.  Anything transactional in nature, money, gifts, favors, etc carries a quid pro quo.

The cap should be $0.  No gifts for public officials, no currying favor by paying for meals or football tickets.  It seems like common sense so I’m not surprised that those in charge are so befuddled and struggling to figure this out.  Par for the course!

This whole group is completely corrupt.

Let’s look at our local corrupt politican Tag Greason.  He was hawking access to himself for a $2500 contribution at recent luncheon.  But somehow, once I pointed this out on Facebook, the public post disappeared.  When a politician is so embarrassed by a shameless plug of cash that they remove it within hours, you know Greason is as crooked as a dog’s hind leg.

I wonder if Greason uses his extra campaign funds to dine with the family at DC Prime or Mortons?  Right now, there are no restrictions on such private use of the funds.  I guess he can use such combined campaign/family dinners to teach his kids the “tricks of the trade”.

“The Virginia General Assembly is set to adjust the state’s ethics laws for the fourth straight year, as lawmakers continue struggling over what kind of gifts they can take from lobbyists and special interests.”

How about you make it easy…. NONE!  No gifts at all.  A gift implies you are getting something in return.  Why is this even an issue?

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at ltmeditor@loudountimes.com.

More News

The Loudoun Times-Mirror

is an interactive, digital replica
of the printed newspaper.
Click here for all e-editions.