Loudoun County Circuit Court Judge Jeanette Irby, who was assigned to preside over a pair of ongoing recall cases involving school board members, is recusing herself from the cases, according to court records.
The court records did not include an explanation for her recusal.
Irby was expected to decide whether to allow Fight for Schools, a political action group made up of mostly parents, to join the cases and separately whether to disqualify Commonwealth’s Attorney, Buta Biberaj (D) from prosecuting the cases.
Shortly before her decision was made public, the NAACP Loudoun Branch announced it was seeking to join the recall cases involving School Board members Brenda Sheridan (Sterling District) and Atoosa Reaser (Algonkian District). A next court appearance was scheduled for Feb. 7.
Michelle Thomas, local pastor and president of the NAACP Loudoun Branch, said the group isn’t concerned with the delay in the cases, but rather “the denial of justice” which she believes would have happened with Irby presiding over the two cases.
“The likelihood of having a fair trial with Judge Irby presiding was slim to none,” Thomas said.
“She had already made up her decision to give them [Fight for Schools] standing and allow them in the case,” she said. “The only thing that stopped her dead in her tracks, which she hadn’t accounted for, was the intervening of the oldest civil rights organization into this case, and Judge Irby said ‘I’m out.’ She decided to save her career and work on her reappointment, versus carrying out this injustice that would have been exposed.”
No ruling has been made as of Tuesday afternoon, according to court records.
Last September, Irby said she would not recuse herself in the first recall case — against now-former school board member Beth Barts — at the request of Barts’ attorney, Charlie King. He is now representing the NAACP Loudoun Branch, along with co-counsel Phillip Thompson.
The case was dismissed in December after Beth Barts resigned from her position. She cited threats against her and her family as the reason for her resignation.
King said looking ahead he’s curious if the remaining Loudoun judges will recuse themselves and request the Virginia Supreme Court appoint a special judge to the cases. Irby is the second judge to rescue herself from the cases, joining Circuit Court Judge Stephen Sincavage who stepped aside due to his connections with LCPS.
“When a litigant is an elected official, in my opinion it’s better practice for local judges to recuse themselves,” King said.
Fight for Schools, a political action committee made up of mostly parents, coordinated the recall petitions. The group claims Biberaj, the prosecutor, was a member of a private Facebook group targeting Parents Against Critical Race Theory and shared on social media a newspaper opinion piece that discussed the academic concept.
A second motions hearing is scheduled for Feb. 23, with Sheridan’s starting at 10 a.m. and Reaser’s at 1 p.m.
In a statement Tuesday morning, Fight for Schools renewed its call for Biberaj to be disqualified from the cases, and examine her alleged conflict of interest and attempts to derail the cases.
“So, the question is — why is Commonwealth Attorney Buta Biberaj so determined to prevent the trial of these removal cases that are based, in part, on activities that she was involved in,” Fight for Schools said in their statement.
Petitions to remove an elected official from office require signatures from district residents equal to at least 10% of the votes cast for that official’s post during the last election, according to Virginia Code.
Further, the code states that upon petition, “a circuit court may remove from office any elected officer or officer who has been appointed to fill an elective office, residing within the jurisdiction of the court for negligence of duty, misuse of office, or incompetence in the performance of duties when that negligence of duty, misuse of office, or incompetence in the performance of duties has a material adverse effect upon the conduct of the office.”
As previously reported, Fight for Schools is also seeking the removal of Ian Serotkin of the Blue Ridge District and At-Large member Denise Corbo. Fight For Schools had not filed a petition seeking their removal as of Tuesday morning.
The late Broad Run District member Leslee King was removed from the group’s recall list after her death at the end of August. King, who was 74, died due to complications from heart surgery.
Lawmakers are considering proposed legislation to reform recall laws as more elected officials are being targeted for removal by political entities across the commonwealth and nationwide.
Judge Irby and attorneys representing the School Board members, and Fight for Schools did not immediately respond to request for comment. Buta Biberaj, the Commonwealth’s Attorney, declined to comment.
(5) comments
She is highly thought of in our house Creigh Deeds not so much!
Having recused herself after the Barts hearing and working to identify a Special Prosecutor, I see nothing different in Judge Irby’s decision here. It appears to me Ms. Thomas is a bit premature patting herself on the back.
Mrs Thomas has become nothing more than a goon for the leftists in LoCo.
Interesting strategy by Ms. Thomas, president of the NAACP, to disparage a distinguished Loudoun County circuit court judge.
I’m sure the other Loudoun judges won’t care that the person representing the NAACP and wanting to join the case is making those types of comments about a colleague of theirs.
But that is a strategy of once great organizations that have lost their way and are now just an action arm (tool) of the democratic party.
I still can’t figure out how in Ms. Thomas’ eyes a recall, proceeding according to Virginia law, is somehow undermining voting rights. I guess that and the race card are the only two cards the NAACP has these days. Too bad. They could do so much for the black community.
Maybe Ms. Thomas and the NAACP don’t care about the School Board denying First Amendment rights to parents and covering up sexual assaults of two girls in our school system. Two issues that parents of all skin colors in Loudoun County have united behind.
Oh, by the way, first time I heard that our District Attorney Buta Biberaj was a member of the private Facebook group that was seeking to silence Parents (of all skin colors) Against Critical Race Theory.
Boy, if that’s true, DA Biberaj better get ready for new employment. Elected members discussing public matters in a private Facebook group is a gross violation of rules governing conduct of elected officials. Particularly from a district attorney who knows better.
I would be willing to bet my house that Irby being worried about the Naacp would be the farthest reason possible to make her step down. The only people that should be afraid of the is the taxpayer who they try and bilk, non-stop.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.