Westpark Golf Course opened in 1968

Westpark Golf Course opened in 1968. City & Suburban Real Estate Brokerage

The discussion on whether the town will pursue an opportunity to purchase the former Westpark Golf Club property may be over.

At a Town Council work session Monday night, a vote to move the process forward could not gain interest from a majority of the six town council members, with Mayor Kelly Burk, Councilman Neil Steinberg and Vice Mayor Marty Martinez in support of continuing the discussion. Council members Suzanne Fox, Thomas Dunn and Ron Campbell opposed moving the item forward. Council currently has one open seat after Josh Thiel resigned at the end of May.

Westpark Golf Club has been closed since last September.

In May, Chuck Kuhn, founder of JK Moving Services, approached the town with an offer to purchase 134 acres for $3.4 million. Kuhn developed plans to purchase the property and place the land in conservation easement so it will be protected from development and used as a park for the community. He would retain an approximately eight-acre commercial site for future development.

In a letter to Burk, Kuhn said he is not interested in seeing the site used as a golf course.

The offer from Kuhn has been updated to extend the study period and closing date from July 1 until September 15.

Councilwoman Fox questioned the price tag Kuhn has placed on the property. She said she did not support funding a park in the current economic climate. “It’s not a priority for me,” Fox said.

Steinberg said he supports purchasing the property, or at least continuing the discussions about what options the town can consider with Kuhn.

“Acquiring the property at this point is the most important thing, and to not do so would be an extraordinarily lost opportunity,” Steinberg said.

Campbell said purchasing the property is not “at any level of priority.”

“This gets no votes from me. It has to be the right deal at the right time at the right place and the right price. We have more critical issues to be worried about. Paying that money is just not the way to go,” he said.

Burk expressed her frustration, saying the purpose of the discussion is to continue the conversation.

“We aren’t saying we are going to buy anything. We intend to discuss public uses, and we need an appraisal, funding options, alternate payment programs, ask the county if they are interested, tree and nutrient programs and to ask if Mr. Kuhn is open to negotiations,” she said.

“To lose the opportunity to have a park at that end of town — as we are almost developed out — would be a shame,” she added.

The future of Westpark has been a consistent debate for Leesburg Town Council over the past year.

In December, a proposal by Lennar to build 96 townhomes on the site failed after Leesburg Town Council voted against it 5-2. Lennar’s proposal was to build the townhomes and potentially donate the remaining 130 acres to the town as a park.

Last year, town staff said a potential park would need to go through a master planning process, likely costing $1-$2 million to develop and about $250,000-300,000 annually to maintain.

The property's zoning currently allows for 27 detached homes. Dittmar Company is listed as the owner, according to a town spokeswoman.

_________

Correction: A previous version of this story stated Lennar owns the former Westpark Golf Club property. While Lennar made a development proposal for the land, those plans were not accepted, and Dittmar Company remains the owner of the property.

(8) comments

David Dickinson

Mayor Burk's (D) backroom dealings doomed this idea. Regardless of its merits, her sneaking around ensured that the other members on the Council wouldn't back it if for no other reason as to show the Mayor that she has to live by the transparency she espouses. Burk screwed this up big time.

Skyprince

how can it be a wetland if it is zoned for 27 houses? Am I missing something here?

Bud

Yes you missed something. Kuhn would retain 8+ acres zones for development. That's where the houses or a commercial development would go. The town would but the rest of the land, which is all or mostly floodplain.

LoudounPulse

The Town of Leesburg is run by clowns. That property is a goldmine and they are just letting it get away. Can't be developed is missing the fact you can build 27 homes on this property. That is likely $20/million worth of homes that "will" be built. Since the Town isn't going to protect it for $3.4/milllion, some developer will be more than happy to add to the roads, schools, EMS, and other services the town will have to pay (for decades) to service those new home owners.

Bud

The land is wetland and can never be developed. It will remain open space, regardless of who owns it. Why waste all that town money?

Djfmer

The city council passing up a really good deal like this is unbelievable! None of them must be able to personally benefit. So stand by for another mega development that will add more congestion.

LeesburgD

I live in Country Club and was disappointed by the vote to at least continue talks. No doubt, the majority of the council would like to see hundreds of homes squeezed on to the property, despite its constant flooding, and their campaign coffers filled by Lennar.

Concerned

Say what? He wants the town to pay him 3.4 million to put land that cannot be developed in easement and also get lucrative tax credits? Double-dipping into the public purse does not sound charitable. Greed and a fleecing?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.