St. Louis | Housing Development Project | Speakers

Residents are shown at a 2019 public meeting at Banneker Elementary School during which many voiced their opposition to a proposed development at the historic Village of St. Louis.

The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors directed staff recently to establish a preservation plan for the Village of St. Louis — one of the first villages in Virginia established by African Americans — following months of debate over a controversial proposed housing project for the area.

The plan is expected to be completed in 2024.

As part of the unanimous vote on consent, the board agreed on Jan. 18 to an initiative which includes potential land use zoning changes and $10,000 to cover the project’s meetings and public outreach. The Department of Planning and Zoning is expected to assume the fiscal impacts.

The board’s plan comes as the Kuhn Family, which has recently purchased numerous county properties for preservation, put a contract on 42-acres in St. Louis, in order to place the area in conservation and prevent the construction of a housing project proposed by developer Mojax LLC.

As part of the buying process the Kuhns conducted a property study of the site, which was owned by Mojax. The previous housing project would have been located north of Snake Hill Road and a quarter mile east of the St. Louis Road intersection.

The 42-acres are located northwest of Middleburg and were slated to be developed into 45 homes.

A spokesperson representing the family said with 42-acres going into conservation it will be used as an open space.

Last April, the board voted to end a proposed deal that included the transfer of Aldie Assemblage — a cluster of historic properties — to Mojax LLC in exchange for the Middleburg Preserve II property, which the board was seeking to place in conservation.

Mojax LLC’s Middleburg Preserve Residential Development Project in St. Louis proposed building 30 single-family detached homes, a roadway and tree conservation areas, according to an executive summary from development representatives.

Mojax and the board exchanged offers to end a controversial housing project proposed for the MP-II property in St. Louis, but the parties could not come to an agreement.

Mojax argued there was risk involved in obtaining sufficient financial benefit from the property with an easement in place, saying it could not recover its acquisition and development costs from the by-right development of MP-II.

(1) comment

jke

One of the first, quite a remarkable feat said no one ever!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for reading!

Please purchase a subscription to read our premium content. If you have a subscription, please log in or sign up for an account on our website to continue.